Another Mom Dies of Broken Heart after Family Court Takes Daughter Away & Allows Father to Deny Contact The following is from a friend of Kelly’s: “Kelly died Saturday. Her ex husband would not let her see her daughter. Or talk to her daughter. Sh… via #AntiSex


Another Mom Dies of Broken Heart after Family Court Takes Daughter Away & Allows Father to Deny Contact

The following is from a friend of Kelly’s:

“Kelly died Saturday. Her ex husband would not let her see her daughter. Or talk to her daughter. She drank herself to death.

Her husband tried to kill her. Pushed her down the stairs and gave her a traumatic brain injury and put her in a coma. She came out of the coma with mental illness. …Her ex husband did not allow her to see her babies and he divorced her when she was in a coma.

It was reported that she fell down the stairs but doctors said it did not look like head injury from a fall. It looks as if her ex husband tried to kill her. When she was in a coma he divorced her and took her daughter and the house. He was not around when she came out of her coma. He didn’t give a f*** about her.

…She did not have mental illness before the coma. I knew her personally and she would not hurt a fly. She drank herself to death. She may not have done that if her ex husband would have at least let her talk to her daughter on the phone. He did not let her see her daughter or talk to her.”

Note: The above is “alleged” by a friend of Kelly’s.

Video Tribute to Kelly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjIx80jQ4cA&feature=youtu.be

List of some of the deaths of mothers and children caused by Family Court:
http://www.freejasmijn.com/?page_id=1677

SAFE KIDS NOTE: We will update with the judge’s name.




AntiSource

Support Angelina Jolie’s Right to Primary Custody! Media/Lawyers Reporting She’s Unlikely to Get It Good Opportunity to Let Public Know Joint Custody is NOT Best & Women Should Have a Right to Remain the Primary Nurturer Angelina requested primary … via #AntiSex


Support Angelina Jolie’s Right to Primary Custody!
Media/Lawyers Reporting She’s Unlikely to Get It

Good Opportunity to Let Public Know Joint Custody is NOT Best & Women Should Have a Right to Remain the Primary Nurturer

Angelina requested primary custody when she filed for divorce on September 19th. Mainstream media is calling this the “custody battle of the century” since Brad says he will fight Angelina’s request for primary custody and Angelina says she will not give up fighting to remain the primary nurturer of her children.

It is being reported that Brad was drunk and physically assaulted his son while on their private plane. Angelina immediately separated from him after that. Brad reportedly has drug and anger issues and Angelina said she filed for divorce for the health of her family.

Joint custody would mean that Angelina’s primary nurturing role will be taken away from her and the children will only be allowed to be with their mom, their primary bond, half time. The children will be forced to pack up every week and move from one parent’s house to the other. Most children do best living with their primary bond and visit the other parent frequently.

The research is clear that mandatory joint custody is not best for children and is often harmful. The only time joint custody works well is when both parents agree it is the best choice for their family. Those cases, however, do not make it to court. When custody is contested, by definition the parents cannot agree. The vast majority of contested custody cases involve fathers trying to take custody away from primary nurturing mothers for financial gain or to get revenge and mothers trying to protect their children from abusive fathers. Judges often minimize or disregard abuse by fathers, so children are routinely being made to live half time with abusers.

This means that mandatory joint custody is not in the “best interest of the child”. So why are laws mandating joint custody so common and why does much of the public accept it as preferred? Because, for decades Fathers’ Rights Activists [FRA’s] have been lobbying and disseminating propaganda that joint custody is best, while women have not organized effectively to oppose their lies and distortions.

Angelina’s battle to maintain her primary nurturing role provides Women’s Coalition followers with a great opportunity to speak up and let the public know the truth about how primary custody is best for kids. This will help turn the tide and begin our fight for the right and the power to remain the primary nurturer after divorce.

SAFE KIDS ACTIVISTS:

1. LIKE our new page: Primary Custody for Primary Nurturers where we are beginning a conversation about how primary nurturing moms should have the right to stay the primary nurturer.
https://www.facebook.com/PrimaryNurturers
Post, comment, react and share.

2. Tweet Angelina:
@AngeelinaJolie #SafeKidsInternational supports you getting primary custody. facebook.com/safekidsinternational #primarymomangelina

3. Tweet Brad:
@personalbrad Don’t take away Angelina’s primary nurturing role. Bad for kids. #primarymomangelina #nojointforbrad

4. Comment on some of the many news articles supporting Angelina’s right to remain the primary nurturer.

5. Follow The Women’s Coalition on Safe Kids: @safekidsinternl

6. Comment, react, share this post.

SAFE KIDS NOTE: There are many misconceptions about joint custody in the articles circulating. One is that the definition of frequent and continuing contact is joint custody, but regular visitation, which is awarded in every case, except those involving abuse, is considered frequent and continuing contact. Here is a quote about it in the LawNewz article:
“In California, unless Jolie can prove that the children’s health, safety and welfare would be severely undermined, custody orders are made to assure the children have “frequent and continuing contact” with both parents. Therefore, joint physical custody is the norm, absent exigent or other serious circumstances.” This article also blames Angelina saying: Hell hath no fury, as if she is doing this out of revenge when in actuality, it appears Brad is the one getting revenge by trying to take custody away. Family Court Bar culture is a big part of the problem.

The other misconception is that joint custody is fair because it’s equal. But it’s not fair to treat two parents who are different in terms of parenting the same. And the standard is what’s best for the kids, not what’s best for a parent.

To Win Sole Physical Custody, Angelina Must Prove Brad’s a Terrible Dad
http://lawnewz.com/uncategorized/to-win-sole-physical-custody-angelina-must-prove-brads-a-terrible-dad/

It’s a BIG deal for a parent to go after sole physical custody — it often suggests something is amiss with the other parent.
http://perezhilton.com/2016-09-20-brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-good-parents-malicious-lies-devoted-father#.V-sq1PArLIU




AntiSource

Mom Takes Her Own Life after Family Court Takes Her Daughter Another Casualty in Family Court War Against Women UPDATE: We have just been informed the judge who took Kate’s daughter was Presiding Judge Laura Dascher, Covington, Virginia “You stole … via #AntiSex


Mom Takes Her Own Life after Family Court Takes Her Daughter
Another Casualty in Family Court War Against Women

UPDATE: We have just been informed the judge who took Kate’s daughter was Presiding Judge Laura Dascher, Covington, Virginia

“You stole my child.”
– Kate O’Connor

Kate posted this sign on her Facebook page:

You stole my child.
You hoped I would go away.
You underestimated my love.
I will never give up.
I will be a voice for my child.
I am not alone.
There are many like me.
By circumstance united.
Together we will be heard.
We will never stop fighting.

And this handmade poster:
“Family Court:Where purgury and hearsay are accepted as fact and you’re guilty until you prove you’re innocent.”

Kate is one of many mothers who simply cannot bear the pain of a child taken from her unjustly by Family Court.

“I will be a voice for my child…Together we will be heard.”
Let’s make Kate’s voice continue to be heard by sharing her story.

SAFE KIDS NOTE:
We do not have much information about Kate’s case, such as who the judge was, what she was falsely accused of, if there was any abuse involved, etc. If anyone knows more about Kate’s case, please PM Safe Kids and we will update this post.

Safe Kids International encourages mothers to connect with other mothers who have had their children taken for support and try and take the long view, as difficult as that is. Your children will most likely come back to you some day and they will need you to help them sort out why they were taken away from you. It’s good to keep a journal about how hard you fought so you can show that to them. And stay active in the fight for the right to keep and protect our children. Activism is the best therapy.




AntiSource

Family Court Attorney Confirms Women Being Called Liars & “Blackmailed” into Shared Parenting System Designed to Discredit Mothers; Give Children to Fathers What Amounts to Mental Torture, Crimes Against Humanity “It is not unusual for a mother to … via #AntiSex


Family Court Attorney Confirms Women Being Called Liars & “Blackmailed” into Shared Parenting

System Designed to Discredit Mothers; Give Children to Fathers
What Amounts to Mental Torture, Crimes Against Humanity

“It is not unusual for a mother to have to find $150,000 to try and protect their children from sexual abusers, only to find at the end of the day that the result was pre-determined from when the mother walked into the Court and filed a form 4 complaining of sexual abuse.”
– Maurice Kriss, attorney, President of National Children’s Protection Alliance

I noticed a distinct pattern of corrupt conduct of the Family Court whereby the mothers were treated with abuse and disrespect. They were called liars and accused them of coaching their children to lie. The fact that very young children at the time were bleeding from the anus or vagina did not move police or Child Protection Authorities into doing proper investigations into the complaint of child sexual abuse. The Family Court Judges, were more concerned with discrediting the mothers and supporting the abuser [father]. The conduct of the court in most of the cases in which I had appeared, were abominable.

I was shocked to realise that conduct of the Family Court ‘Magellan List’ [court officials, children’s attorneys and psychologists appointed in abuse cases] was an orchestrated corrupt system that was designed to discredit mothers and remove their children from them. What was puzzling to me was what was their motivation for acting in such an inhumane manner. This question can be answered on another occasion.

The mothers that I have represented are only the tip of a very large iceberg. Over the years we are talking of thousands of mothers who have been described by the Judiciary as having had a “parentectomy” not appendectomy but a “parentectomy” the forcible removal of a mother from her child for the crime of reporting sexual abuse of her child by her husband or partner and in some cases the grandfather. It took me some time to realise that the mothers had lost their children from the moment they filled in a form 4 reporting sexual abuse.

I endeavoured to report the conduct of the Family Court to friends and acquaintances, but was met with disbelief and their belief that mothers lie to stop their husband from seeing their children. I was accused of being obsessed and crazy. The Myth of lying mothers was deeply entrenched in the community.

It is reasonable for the community at large to ask why if what I am saying is correct, why have they not heard of the forcible removal of mothers from their children and the children handed to their sexual abusers? Why is not written in the newspapers or magazines or on the TV? The reason is that the Family court has a complete gag order which can punish anyone who breaches this order of silence with 12 months’ jail.

The Chief justice of the Family Court, Dianne Bryant. Maintains that these draconian orders are to protect children. Nothing could be further from the truth. S121 is for the protection of Judges, employed selected psychologists, and the so called Independent Child Lawyers in their immoral and illegal conduct in removing mothers from their children. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to raise these issues of this corrupt system because of a gag order in the preventing them from doing so. So their conduct cannot be revealed to the general public. No newspaper will write about it, no radio station will report it and no TV program will cover it. They are warned off. Failure to comply can result in a jail sentence. However, articles are starting to appear about the dysfunction of the Family Court and complaints by mothers as to their treatment.

The NCPA presents the case against the Family Court of Australia to you on behalf of literally thousands of mothers and children around Australia who have suffered no less than war crimes against humanity. You will read a number of claims against the Family Court which include: Breaches of the United Nations Rights of the Child, Denial of Natural Justice and Human Rights. The misuse of equal parenting provisions in the Family Law Act to punish mothers and allow sexual abuse of their children. The appointment of the Independent Child’s Lawyer (ICL) by the Court to be used as a tool in supporting the destruction of the mother and in the conduct of the proceedings, support the father of the child or children. Most of them have never seen the children or the mother, but support the removal of the child from the primary carer.

… The Court’s selective appointments of psychiatrists or psychologist that are hired for the specific purpose of making false or negative reports against the mothers. The Fraudulent reports by psychologists or psychiatrist claiming the mothers are suffering from serious mental illnesses, for the purpose of removing the children from their mother and handing them to their abuser. The bias of psychologists that use a template of mental disorders for the purpose of recommending to the court the removal of children from their mothers. The exorbitant fees charged by the selected psychologist as much as $27000 or more for 3 one hourly interviews.

It is not unusual for a mother to have to find $150,000 to try and protect their children from sexual abusers, only to find at the end of the day that the result was pre-determined from when the mother walked into the Court and filed a form 4 complaining of sexual abuse. It is quite amazing that the Psychologists and the Family Court maintain the mothers are delusional, in addition to every known mental illness known to man, and yet these mothers have provided every last cent in legal fees to protect their children from abuse. Neither would a mother lie, and go to such lengths to maintain that lie.

The NCPA charges the Family Court, with consistent breaches of the ‘Denial of Natural Justice’, ‘Breach of human rights’, and knowingly and ‘consistently committing mental torture, to mothers and children. This is a most serious statement, It, is not made lightly. This claim is not uniquely an Australian problem but a world-wide problem, at least in the UK and the USA, Denmark and Ireland, where children are removed from their mothers for doing what they are mandated to do, care and protect their child.

We ask how in the name of humanity in the 21st century can a civil court remove a child from its primary carer and hand that child to its abuser.

… It is the NCPA’s charge that the family Court when removing children from their primary care and handing them to those who have abused or, sexually abused them, is “torture” The Court can and does refuse the mother to see her children until the child is 18 years of age. The Court also makes shared parenting orders which can also be described as torture. The mental distress on both children and mothers can be rightfully described as torture as a result many children and their mothers, suffer serious illness as a result. Members of the NCPA have witnessed the suffering of both mothers and children over the years.

…Once it is known that The Family Court is involved in an investigation, Police and protection officers lose interest. More often than not report “unsubstantiated” a code word for the mother is a liar and the child has been taught to lie.

… Many mothers, are forced to sign consent orders agreeing to shared parenting with the abuser or lose the child for many years.

… A painful choice, have your child abused for only half the time or all the time. It has been reported that some mothers are forced to admit that they were delusional when they reported the sexual assault. Having now admitted that they were delusional, the mothers is given gag order preventing them reporting further sexual abuse to the police or any other authority. Ordered that the mother cannot take the child to a doctor, hospital, or Psychologist without the father’s approval.

Excerpts from:
Mothers are being blackmailed into shared parenting
in the Family Court ‘Magellan List’
http://familylaw.singlemum.com.au/mothers-in-magellan-family-court-24092016-maurice-kriss.html#

SAFE KIDS NOTE:
This is an excellent article and it is well worth reading the whole thing. However, it is important to understand that sexual abuse is only one of the circumstances in which men are being systemically entitled to take children away from mothers, albeit the most serious and possibly the most common. This issue is not exclusively a child protection issue. It is a male entitlement/gender discrimination issue and needs to be fought as such to be effective.

Men are being entitled to take kids away from mothers and abuse them or not. This should not be a surprise because men have bequeathed this power upon themselves since patriarchy began. In fact, the main reason for men instituting patriarchal rule was to gain power and control over women and children.

But it is a huge surprise to most people because women and the public have been duped into believing mothers are the ones favored in custody disputes and men are being discriminated against. And, as this article explains, mothers who know the truth are being silenced through threats and gag orders.

This drives home how very important it is that women whose children have aged out of the system engage in activism to stop the massacre.




AntiSource

Awesome Opportunity to Get Public Recognition Through Art! Yoko Ono Calls for “Testaments of Harm” for “ARISING” Project Yoko invites women from all over the world to send a testament of harm inflicted on them for simply being what they are: a woma… via #AntiSex


Awesome Opportunity to Get Public Recognition Through Art!
Yoko Ono Calls for “Testaments of Harm” for “ARISING” Project

Yoko invites women from all over the world to send a testament of harm inflicted on them for simply being what they are: a woman.

1. TAKE a picture/selfie of your eyes.

2. WRITE a short testimonial saying you were seriously harmed when Family Court empowered the father of your children to take them away from you.

3. SAY you are with The Women’s Coalition or add the hashtag #thewomenscoalition, as we will ask Yoko to gather Coalition submissions together in one section as a testament to the epidemic.

4. EMAIL picture and testament to: arising@reykjavik.is [Please cc to womenscoalitionintl@gmail.com or send it there if you want anonymity.]

5. JOIN event: https://www.facebook.com/events/1807494219464417/ [You are encouraged to post your submission on this event page.]

6. SHARE, comment & react to this post and encourage all protective moms to participate!

PLEASE take the time to participate in this important form of activism. Taking children away from women is arguably one of the worst forms of harm that can be done to a woman and Yoko is providing an awesome opportunity for the epidemic to be recognized by the general public.

Open Call from Yoko:

WOMEN OF ALL AGES, FROM ALL COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD: YOU ARE INVITED TO SEND A TESTAMENT OF HARM DONE TO YOU FOR BEING A WOMAN.

WRITE YOUR TESTAMENT IN YOUR OWN LANGUAGE, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, AND WRITE HOWEVER OPENLY YOU WISH.

YOU MAY SIGN YOUR FIRST NAME IF YOU WISH, BUT DO NOT GIVE YOUR FULL NAME.

SEND A PHOTOGRAPH OF YOUR EYES.

THE TESTAMENTS OF HARM AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF YOUR EYES WILL BE EXHIBITED IN MY INSTALLATION ARISING, OCTOBER 7, 2016 – FEBRUARY 5 2017, AT REYKJAVÍK ART MUSEUM.

I VERY MUCH HOPE FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.

yoko ono
SEPTEMBER 6, 2016

ARISING will open in Reykjavik, Iceland on October 7th but it is an ongoing project and it will always be possible to add testaments. We are hoping the project will go on tour to other countries soon.

Bring your testaments and photographs of your eyes in person, send them by mail to Arising, Listasafn Reykjavíkur, Tryggvagata 17, 101 Reykjavík or send them by email to: arising@reykjavik.is

Arising – An open call from Yoko Ono to women worldwide
#ixzz4KivOO8Mv” target=”_blank”>http://www.icenews.is/2016/09/10/arising-an-open-call-from-yoko-ono-to-women-worldwide/ #ixzz4KivOO8Mv

FB event page: https://www.facebook.com/events/1807494219464417/




AntiSource

UK Legislators Rise Against “Deep Seated” Bias Against Women Call for End to Permission for Men to Control & Abuse Women & Kids “A transformation of family courts is desperately needed to end the abuse and brutalization of women via the legal system… via #AntiSex


UK Legislators Rise Against “Deep Seated” Bias Against Women
Call for End to Permission for Men to Control & Abuse Women & Kids

“A transformation of family courts is desperately needed to end the abuse and brutalization of women via the legal system.”
– Peter Kyle, Labour MP

“There is growing evidence that perpetrators of domestic abuse are using the family courts to continue to harass and control their victims.”
– Keir Starmer, Labour MP

“There is a need both to end the assumption that men who were abusive to women could be good fathers, and to embed a culture in the family courts of putting children first.”
– Angela Smith, Labour MP

The government must carry out a full review of family courts to stop them being used by violent men to perpetuate abuse against their partners and children, MPs [Members of Parliament] have said.

They called on the justice secretary, Liz Truss, to act swiftly to tackle deep-seated cultural attitudes among family court judges which put the rights of abusive men over the safety of women and children.
MPs were debating research by Women’s Aid which revealed that between 2005 and 2015, 19 children in 12 families were killed by violent fathers who had been allowed to see them through formal and informal child contact arrangements.

The debate focused on many personal stories of women who had been subjected to violence and coercive control by their partners, only to have to face them again in the family courts when the men fought for child contact.

MPs said the family court system was allowing violent men to re-victimise women. Increasing numbers of men were representing themselves and re-traumatising their victims when they made repeated and often spurious applications for access, they said.
Peter Kyle, the Labour MP for Hove, said: “The family courts are being used to perpetrate abuse against extremely vulnerable women.

… One of my constituents has been cross-examined by her former partner on three separate occasions, the man who beat her, broke her bones and battered her unconscious.”

He said a transformation of family courts was “desperately needed” to end the “abuse and brutalisation of women” via the legal system.
Angela Smith, the Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, raised the case of her constituent Claire Throssell and her children, Jack, 12, and Paul, nine, as Throssell watched from the public gallery.

Throssell’s estranged partner, Darren Sykes, a perpetrator of domestic violence who had threatened her and his children, murdered both boys during a contact visit to his home in 2014 by enticing them to the loft with a new train set. He then set 16 fires in the house and barricaded the home.

He had been given contact by the family court despite the authorities’ knowledge of his violence and the children’s expressed fear of their father.

… Smith said the family courts needed to properly implement “practice guidance 12 J”, which is supposed to force judges to put the safety of children and their residential parent before the access rights of a violent and abusive parent.

She highlighted the demands in the Women’s Aid report for an end to the cross-examination of a survivor by an abuser in family courts, and for special protection to be brought in, such as separate waiting areas, to keep victims safe from violent partners in court buildings.
Smith said there was a need both to end the assumption that men who were abusive to women could be good fathers, and to embed a culture in the family courts of putting children first.

Keir Starmer, the former director of public prosecutions and Labour MP for Holborn and St Pancras…said there was growing evidence that perpetrators of domestic abuse were using the family courts to continue to harass and control their victims.

Excerpts from:
MPs call for end to abusive men using courts against families
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/sep/15/mps-call-for-end-to-abusive-men-using-courts-against-families

SAFE KIDS NOTE
It is great that these legislators are bringing attention to the fact that family courts are permitting men to continue to control and abuse women and children after divorce, however, it is not just violent men who are being empowered and their proposed solution will not stop the crisis.

New policy putting children and their safety first will only enable a small percentage of women to protect their children, because in most cases judges and court officials are deliberately minimizing and disregarding abuse by fathers and deeming mothers the abusive parent for lying about abuse and alienating children from fathers. This new policy may even make it easier for men to take children away from mothers under the guise they are being protected from the mother.

What is needed is an entirely new system which functions like a real court, not a kangaroo court, and does not depend on a biased judge and court-affiliated officials for a decision on such a vital matter.

[Pictured: Keir Starmer (top left); Angela Smith (middle left); Peter Kyle (bottom left); Liz Trussy




AntiSource

Blogger Mom Threatened with Defamation Lawsuit: Stands Her Ground Ex’s Parents Not Happy with Talk of Them Enabling Molester Son Christie Brinkley Encourages Mom’s Free Speech “Their family has now been thrust into the spotlight due to their son’s a… via #AntiSex


Blogger Mom Threatened with Defamation Lawsuit: Stands Her Ground
Ex’s Parents Not Happy with Talk of Them Enabling Molester Son
Christie Brinkley Encourages Mom’s Free Speech

“Their family has now been thrust into the spotlight due to their son’s arrest and now they want to silence me…While I hold my ex-husband, his brother and his father accountable for their evil ways, I find the most fault with their mother who was conscious enough and able to prevent the destruction caused by these men…Instead, she lied over and over for her family – even under oath when it came time to protect my daughters, her granddaughters. Had she not worked so hard to keep the family image perfect and shiny, many lives would have been spared pain and heartache.”
– Tina Swithin, Founder of One Mom’s Battle

“She must be allowed to keep speaking the truth, and providing the assistance that only one who has been thru it can deliver.”
– Christie Brinkley, model, advocate

The parents of a man facing 23 charges related to the sexual abuse of children took the first step toward legal action against their former daughter-in-law Tina Swithin, following Swithin’s public disclosures about her divorce and visitation battles. On Sept. 7, attorney Dennis Balsamo sent a letter demanding Swithin stop making “slanderous statements” about his clients, Lyle and Margaret Porter, and retract previous comments. Balsamo claims Swithin’s writings and statements have caused the Porters “significant financial harm.”

… Swithin responded by posting a GoFundMe page, which has already raised $8,887 of her $10,000 goal. Donations include $1,000 from actress and model Christie Brinkley who has asked her fans to support Swithin’s “right to free speech.”

… In July, police served a search warrant on the home Jason Robert Porter shares with his parents and found thousands of images and videos that were believed to be child pornography. Investigators have identified at least 17 children and multiple adult women Jason Porter allegedly sexually molested or secretly photographed.

On July 16, Paso Robles Police officers arrested Jason Porter and booked him into the San Luis Obispo County Jail in lieu of $7 million bail. Also in July, Swithin posted a blog detailing her alleged struggles with the Porter family.

… “In 2009, I began divorce proceedings and a child custody battle in pro se. It defied logic at every turn — several therapists told me that my ex-husband had high narcissistic or worse, sociopathic traits. In 2011, I began blogging about my journey and my plight received international media attention.

“My ex-brother in-law, Jason Porter (who was a huge part of my custody battle) was arrested for child molestation and I have been told it is the worst case of child sex abuse that SLO County has seen in 15 years. His bail has been set at an unprecedented $7,000,000.

… “Today I received a four-page letter from an attorney in San Luis Obispo County requesting that I cease writing about the family. I need to hire an attorney this week…All donations will be channeled directly into my upcoming legal fees. Any funds that are unused will go to my 501(c)3 non-profit organization, One Mom’s Battle (OMB) and will be used to send educational packets to family court professionals.

Excerpts from:
Porters threaten Tina Swithin with a lawsuit
#sthash.9ti3FBgp.dpbs” target=”_blank”>https://calcoastnews.com/2016/09/porters-threaten-tina-swithin-lawsuit/ #sthash.9ti3FBgp.dpbs

WOMEN’S COALITION NOTE: It appears this is just a threat of a lawsuit made to intimidate Tina into silence, but the perp’s family will not likely follow through on it. They risk getting even more and worse publicity and harming their son’s case in criminal court.

The Gofundme page says donations not used on the lawsuit will go to sending educational packets to family court professionals, but it is not a lack of knowledge about abuse or narcissism that is causing the crisis. Judges know exactly what they are doing when they grant custody to unfit and abusive fathers. The only reason Tina was eventually successful in protecting her children was likely because she had international media attention and celebrities supporting her, not because her judge all of a sudden understood narcissism.

The crisis of women’s inability to maintain custody or protect their children is an epidemic being caused by systemic male entitlement, and the only thing that will stop it is a new system which does not allow discrimination against women.

You can join and support Safe Kids International & The Women’s Coalition’s efforts to create and implement a new system which will protect women’s and children’s rights:
www.WomensCoalitionInternational.org
@thewomensco




AntiSource

New Info Confirms Murder-Suicide Followed Mother’s Inability to Protect Daughter from Reported Sexual Abuse As Usual: Judge Deemed Mom Liar; Granted Sole Custody to Father Activists: Let Toronto Sun Reporter Know He Got It Wrong “She took her life… via #AntiSex


New Info Confirms Murder-Suicide Followed Mother’s Inability to Protect Daughter from Reported Sexual Abuse

As Usual: Judge Deemed Mom Liar; Granted Sole Custody to Father
Activists: Let Toronto Sun Reporter Know He Got It Wrong

“She took her life and her child’s to save them both from the hell that so many of us live.”
– Protective Mom Elizabeth

“(The) mother’s conduct can only be described as a relentless pursuit of securing control of the child’s custody and … limiting the time that the father could spend with the child.”
– Justice Margaret Anne Scott

SHAME on Justice Margaret Anne Scott for calling Peria a liar and giving custody of Lisa to her identified molester.

… Just days after her father, 53, finally cleared his name in court and was granted sole custody, the little girl and her mother, Peria Stachow, 45, were found dead in the mom’s Whitby apartment.

…Family court documents obtained by the Toronto Sun show the child’s parents separated nearly two years ago and both fought hard to win sole custody of the girl.

…Peria Stachow levied several accusations against her estranged husband over the last two years, but cops and CAS [social services] found no evidence he ever sexually abused their six-year-old daughter. Justice Margaret Ann Scott recently concluded that Stachow coached the child on what to say in an effort to get sole custody.

… The couple’s relationship was clearly on the rocks in recent years. Peria left the matrimonial home without notifying her husband in Dec. 2014 and took Sarah with her.

The mom and daughter headed to a shelter where Peria claimed she left home to protect her child from her dad’s “sexually inappropriate behaviour.” And in an apparent effort to start over fresh, she began calling her daughter Lisa. It would be weeks before J.S. [father] would see his daughter again.

Peria was granted temporary custody in February 2015 and her ex was initially only allowed supervised visits with their daughter.
Peria would go on to make an assortment of sex abuse accusations to cops, doctors and Children’s Aid Society workers, none of whom was ever able to substantiate her claims.

Reports presented in court suggest the daughter’s memories were full of “inconsistencies” and “not reality-based.”

…On Aug. 29 [Judge Scott] determined the dad should have sole custody and granted Peria visitation every Wednesday and every other weekend.

“(The) mother’s conduct can only be described as a relentless pursuit of securing control of the child’s custody and … limiting the time that the father could spend with the child,” Scott said in her ruling.

Sadly, the lifeless bodies of Peria and her daughter were discovered four days later.

…According to court documents, these are some of Stachow’s wild accusations:

– Claimed she caught her husband lying behind their daughter on the floor of the family’s play room “moving his buttocks back and forth” and he had “an erection beneath his shorts” that he tried to hide with his hands.

– Claimed daughter was singing into a paper tube that she then put near her vagina and commented on the tube being the same size as her daddy’s penis.

– Claimed daughter recounted how daddy touched her leg with his penis and she ran away “scared,” but the father chased after her saying, “Shush … don’t tell mommy.”

– Claimed her ex stood behind their child pressing his “privates” against her “privates” while at Chuck E. Cheese, but investigators determined the father was simply helping his daughter play a video game.

Excerpts from
Custody battle ended days before deaths of Whitby mom and daughter
http://www.torontosun.com/2016/09/08/custody-battle-ended-days-before-deaths-of-whitby-mom-and-daughter

COALITION ACTIVISTS: Email Toronto Sun Reporter Chris Doucette to let him know he got the story wrong¬ and ask him to write an unbiased article from the perspective of Peria and the thousands of mothers who find themselves in the same position as Peria. The public must be given the truth by the media. Write your own or copy and paste.

Chris Doucette: cdoucette@postmedia.com

Dear Chris,
I am with Safe Kids International, a nonprofit dedicated to raising awareness about the epidemic of women losing custody when they attempt to protect their children in Family Court. We want you to know that your article did not reflect the reality women face every day in family courts around the world. Women are being falsely labeled liars to cover up abuse by fathers and justify giving them custody.

Reports of abuse by fathers, especially sexual abuse, are almost always poorly investigated and lead to unsubstantiated or unfounded findings by police and social services, but these do not equal false allegations. It merely means there was not enough evidence at the present time to support a finding. The problem is Family Court judges and court-appointed “experts” routinely minimize, disregard and conceal evidence of paternal abuse, while discrediting and disparaging the mothers who report it.

The fact that there are millions of such cases around the world support that this phenomenon is caused by systemic discrimination against women. This discrimination was recently recognized by the United Nations and it means that a finding by a potentially biased family court judge does not necessarily mean Peria’s reports were false.

In fact, it is much more likely her reports, and those of her daughters, were true. The research and countless case studies confirm is an international pattern being followed beginning with women reporting sexual abuse and ending with judges switching custody to the identified molester. Not to mention the fact that one in four girls is molested and the majority is committed by fathers.
Please make up for your biased article by writing another one with the facts and research supporting there is a crisis in family courts and that Peri and Lisa were likely telling the truth.

Thank you

SAFE KIDS NOTE: Some of the bias in the article is evident in these excerpts:

“Peria Stachow levied several accusations…”
*The word “levied” is loaded against the accuser.

“Peria would go on to make an assortment of sex abuse accusations to cops, doctors and Children’s Aid Society workers, none of whom was ever able to substantiate her claims.”
*Use of the word “assortment” and “claimed” is discrediting.

“Reports presented in court suggest the daughter’s memories were full of “inconsistencies” and “not reality-based.”
*First, these reports were likely by court-affiliated mental health professionals who are frequently biased against reporting mothers. Second, the examples of abuse the child reported are actually not inconsistent and are reality based, and the reporter failed to mention this.

“According to court documents, these are some of Stachow’s wild accusations…”
*Use of the word “wild” leads the reader to believe the accusations are not believable when, in fact, they are actually very believable considering one in four girls is molested.

“Justice Margaret Ann Scott recently concluded that Stachow coached the child on what to say in an effort to get sole custody.”
*The reporter failed to look critically at that statement. What was it Lisa said that appeared to be coached and why? Did what Lisa said actually sound coached or is there a possibly she wasn’t? It appears that Peria fled into a shelter from their home in order to protect her daughter from sexual abuse, which means there was not a custody battle at the time she made the allegations. It was the allegations that led to the custody battle.

“…police and CAS found NO evidence to support the claims.”
*This is a false statement. Reports by the mother and the child constitute important evidence. In fact, the child’s reports of abuse are the most important evidence in any sexual abuse case. But the biased system devalues children’s and women’s testimony.

Previous post:
Judge Orders 6 YO Taken from Primary-Nurturing Mom, Given to Father
Devastated Mom Commits Murder-Suicide Rather Than Comply
https://www.facebook.com/TheWomensCoalition/photos/a.1464723457135309.1073741828.1459888504285471/1786514744956177




AntiSource

Judge Orders 6 YO Taken from Primary-Nurturing Mom, Given to Father Devastated Mom Commits Murder-Suicide Rather Than Comply “She was just a single mom struggling with no support…and she fought to the bitter end for her daughter.” – Peria’s fri… via #AntiSex


Judge Orders 6 YO Taken from Primary-Nurturing Mom, Given to Father
Devastated Mom Commits Murder-Suicide Rather Than Comply

“She was just a single mom struggling with no support…and she fought to the bitter end for her daughter.”
– Peria’s friend

The sudden death of a woman and her young daughter on Friday has left other residents of their Whitby apartment building, with whom they’d shared playdates and conversations, shaken and bewildered.

“She had such a big heart and really, she was just a single mom struggling with no support and she wanted the best for her daughter,” said Heather Mertin, who said she met Peria Stachow, 44, and her 6-year-old daughter, Sarah “Lisa” Stachow, shortly after they moved in about a year ago. “And she fought to the bitter end for her daughter.”

Durham Region homicide detectives identified the pair Saturday evening, but are not releasing the details of how they died, though a post-mortem has been completed. The bodies were found at the 250 Hickory St. South building at about 4 p.m. Friday.
CP24, quoting an unidentified source, described their deaths as a murder-suicide.

Residents said Stachow had told them she had no family in Canada and had been locked in a bitter custody battle with her ex-husband.
Mertin, who has a young daughter of her own, said the woman known to her simply as Peria suggested setting up playdates, and that the children got along well. She and the woman would go swimming together at the local YMCA and have “deep conversations.”

Excerpts from:
Police identify mother-daughter pair found dead in Whitby apartment
https://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2016/09/02/homicide-detectives-investigating-whitby-deaths.html

REST IN PEACE Peria and Lisa.
May Peria and Lisa’s death fuel the OUTRAGE necessary to motivate women to unite end the massacre of mothers and children in family courts. Some day soon women must gain the power to keep and protect their children so this devastation of mothers and children ends.

SAFE KIDS NOTE: There are no details available about the custody battle to take Lisa away from Peria except that after a long fight to keep her, Peria was ordered by a family court judge to give her to the father on Friday. After Peria did not show up to hand Lisa over, they were found deceased in their apartment.

If anyone knows who the Whitby, Ontario, Canada family court judge is who took custody away from Peria or any other details, please contact womenscoalitionintl@gmail.com




AntiSource

FREE for 3 Days: Book About Mom’s Daring Escape to Protect Son from Sexual Abuse …And the Capture, Arrest, Incarceration & Loss of Contact with Her Precious Baby One woman’s story of courage and determination as she goes to extraordinary lengths to … via #AntiSex


FREE for 3 Days: Book About Mom’s Daring Escape to Protect Son from Sexual Abuse
…And the Capture, Arrest, Incarceration & Loss of Contact with Her Precious Baby

One woman’s story of courage and determination as she goes to extraordinary lengths to protect her son from abuse when he is disbelieved by those who are meant to protect him. Fleeing half way across the world with her son’s hand in hers, she attempts to take him to safety and begin a new life pursued by those who are determined to take her child and place him in the hands of the person he fears most…his father…
– Amazon description

Judges play God in the family court but nothing could be more cruel than to separate mother and child because it causes bereavement for both and is irreparably damaging.

…It is a systemic problem of massive proportions that sees more and more mothers losing custody of their children to physically and sexually abusive fathers and leaves mothers in despair and living in fear of speaking out. Most are placed on injunctions [gag orders] by the court – but if we continue to live in fear of speaking the pain and suffering, if we allow ourselves to be oppressed then change cannot occur.

The veil of secrecy that protects the abuse of justice from scrutiny must be lifted for with every evil regime that has ever existed, good has eventually triumphed by the voices of the masses against the evil of the few.

And now to Charlotte’s story, a story of courage, strength, determination and unfailing love in the face of anguish.

…The reality was no freedom and a slow death and when I would not cooperate in handing [my son over to his abuser] without a fight, I was told I would either be jailed or put into a mental hospital – for they were determined to silence me at all costs.

…[F]or some twelve years now I had been a prisoner of a system…that allowed women to be placed not just in a second class citizen role, but at the bottom of the heap…

…You cannot fight them…They operate behind a cloth of gold. You can only punch at the cloth, but you will not make a dent. They are all protected and will only protect each other.

…My son’s cries to make it stop – make them stop – make the Courts, Social Services, the judge, the so-called officers, experts and judge – all colluding in destroying a child who dared to break his silence to tell me his father had been abusing him and that he no longer wanted to see him. For that he was punished, accused of lying, denigrated by the system, by one so-called expert after another, all who refused to listen to him.

…I had collapsed in the courtroom from shock when my advocate had read out the evil plan for my son – to crush, destroy, devastate – to fulfill the increasing demands of a man who had no soul, who watched his son’s suffering at a tender age with brutal satisfaction, smugness and a smile like a cruel slash of a knife across his face. He had the whole court in the palm of his hand.

Fathers for Justice had swung the pendulum of the court so far away from the biological and natural role of motherhood that men were now it seemed more suitable to raise children regardless of their fitness, ability or relationship with the child. The sound of Patriarchy rang in my ears – Man, Man, Man – and Woe to anyone who dared to question the sanity, logic or reason – Woe to Man – woe Man – Woe – Man – Woman.

..Here we were now marginalized, abused, suppressed and voiceless. Were we back in the Dark Ages before enlightenment, intelligence, freedom of speech – the vote?…The crazy brave new world of Fathers…the brainwashing of children to attempt to break their souls before giving them over to abuse – for what?

Since our horrific nightmare began, others had contacted me to say they were in the same position. Some had already lost their children to violent or abusive men. The subversion of all that was natural – a mother’s bond with a child the strongest bond that can exist as you carry them inside you and nurture with your very soul the life force within.

The world was now taking nature on its head, going against all that was natural and beautiful and strong and cutting it with cruel slashes of legislation” – empty laws, empty words, empty threats.

EXCERPTS from:
Mummy Where Are You?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1502355280/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_dp_c_JwkZxbKVM7ZA1
DOWNLOAD FREE until September 8, 2016!

SAFE KIDS NOTE: “Charlotte” is based on a real mom who fled from the Isle of Mann in the UK to Canada. She was captured six years ago and incarcerated for almost a year. She has had to live without her son ever since. The fact that she has not even been permitted supervised visitation shows that she is being punished for having dare challenged male entitlement by reporting sexual abuse and trying to protect her son from his father.

SAFE KIDS ACTIVISTS:
1) Please show support for this mom, who desperately misses her son, by commenting, reacting and sharing.

2) Write a brief review of this book so it rises in popularity. This helps the public see what is going on by giving the woman’s side of the story, rather than the power elite’s which is covered by mainstream media. You can even just write one sentence if you want. It is the number of reviews that counts.




AntiSource